Tuesday, November 19, 2019
Anthropogenic Climate change?
I'm an inventor scientist with 20 patents and I have a good grasp of how things work.
The Climate Alarmist Religion does not like:
1,300 watts per square meter solar heat
0.028 watts per square meter anthropogenic heat
0.004 parts CO2 in atmosphere.
If GHG reflects heat back to earth it would reflect 46,000 times as much heat into space. The more GHG the cooler the earth would become.
Research - there is far more than this:
Forest management is the key to preventing wildfires:
Planting more forests is an exercise in futility until we have the will to control wildfires in the forests we have. (In grade 6 we learned that when a tree grows it absorbs CO2. When it dies it releases the CO2 back into the atmosphere)
If a single 220,000# whale can capture the same amount of carbon dioxide as 30,000 trees, and be worth $2,000,000 in carbon credits, then a single 1,200 pound cow can capture the same amount of carbon dioxide as 8,800 trees, and is worth $10,800 in carbon credits!
Tens of thousands of scientists deny Anthropogenic climate change. The media likes to call them ignorant. (So they can ignore them?)
Estimated 40 Percent of Scientists Doubt Manmade Global Warming
Climate Science's Myth-Buster
It's time to be scientific about global warming, says climatologist Judith Curry
From Turku University in Finland https://www.utu.fi/en
NO EXPERIMENTAL EVIDENCE FOR THE SIGNIFICANT ANTHROPOGENIC CLIMATE CHANGE
The list goes on and on. Media likes to ignore the facts and blame every weather event on climate change. Venice is flooding because of it. No mention that the flood was higher 60 years ago.
Is there hope that we will get impartial reporting in the foreseeable future?